|
The History of
Banking, Simplified
Modern banks are supposed to have
originated with goldsmiths, whose
primary business was making jewelry but
who developed a profitable sideline as
keepers of other people's coin: since
goldsmiths' shops had good safes, they
provided more secure places for the
wealthy to stash their cash than, say, a
strongbox under the bed. (Think of Silas
Marner.)
At some point goldsmiths discovered that
they could make their sideline as
keepers of coin even more profitable by
taking some of the coin deposited in
their care and lending it out at
interest. You might think this would get
them in trouble: what if the owners of
the coin showed up and demanded it right
away? But what the goldsmiths realized
was that the law of averages made this
unlikely: on any given day some of their
depositors would show up and demand
their coin back, but most would not. So
it was enough to keep a fraction of the
coin in reserve; the rest could be put
to work. And thus banking was born.
Every once in a while, however, things
would go spectacularly wrong. There
would be a rumor—maybe true, maybe
false—that a bank's investments had gone
bad, that it no longer had enough assets
to repay its depositors. The rumor would
cause a rush by depositors to get their
money out before it was all gone—what we
call "a run on the bank." And often such
a run would break the bank even if the
original rumor was false: in order to
raise cash quickly, the bank would have
to sell off assets at fire-sale prices,
and sure enough, at those prices it
wouldn't have enough assets to pay what
it owed. Since runs based even on false
rumors could break healthy institutions,
bank runs became self-fulfilling
prophecies: a bank might collapse, not
because there was a rumor about its
investments having gone bad, but simply
because there was a rumor that it was
about to suffer from a run.
And one thing that could cause such a
rumor is the fact that other banks had
already suffered from bank runs. The
history of the U.S. financial system
before the Great Depression is
punctuated by "panics": the Panic of
1873, the Panic of 1907, and so on.
These panics were, for the most part,
series of contagious bank runs in which
each bank's collapse undermined
confidence in other banks, and financial
institutions fell like a row of
dominoes.
By the way, any resemblance between
this description of pre-Depression
panics and the financial contagion that
swept Asia in the late 1990s is not at
all coincidental. All financial crises
tend to bear a family resemblance to one
another.
The problem of banking panics led to a
search for solutions. Between the Civil
War and World War I the United States
did not have a central bank—the Federal
Reserve was created in 1913 - but it did
have a system of "national banks" that
were subject to a modest degree of
regulation. Also, in some locations
bankers pooled their resources to create
local clearinghouses that would jointly
guarantee a member's liabilities in the
event of a panic, and some state
governments began offering deposit
insurance on their banks' deposits.
Source:
62248925-Krugman-Paul-The-Return-of-Depression-Economics-and-
the-Crisis-of-2008-2e-Norton-2009
Banking
Investing
Bankruptcy
Tax Preparation
Business Grants
Car
Donation
Credit Cards
Credit Score
Credit Repair
Cash Advance
Home Equity
Internet Banking
401k
Real Estate
Save Money
Annuity
Retirement Planning
Forex Trading
Family Budget
Mortgage
Foreclosure
Car Donation
Unclaimed Money
Useful Resources
Freebies
Bernard L. Madoff
Blog
Keywords
Privacy Policy
Sitemap
© Copyright 2009 - 2011 Personal-finance-info.org. All rights reserved.
Email: personal-finance-info.org[at]gmail.com
|